The typical haircut policy for most schools and universities in the Philippines is 2 x 3 or better referred to as Barber Shop Mission Valley cut&rdquo. The hair is reduced to two inches shaved on the sides and three inches shaved on the rear to give you a clear picture. Some schools that implement such policies are Aquinas College, St. Andrew’s College, and Don Boaco Technical Institute. Like every other policy, haircut policy pertains to a specific category of men and women; males only. By regularly having a haircut, the students bear in mind they have something to accomplish at a particular time every month.
That’s the disciple that the institution administrators emphasize. I think the two x 3 haircut plan isn’t required for implementation in schools because it doesn’t have an effect or contribution to a student’s learning. “The barber’s cut looks neat and clean, in line with the administration of the schools that implement the policy. It creates the student search reasonable and respectable.
Fine teenage boys are how guy pupils with such hairstyle are treated. It’s pretty hygienic as well because the likelihood of messing up the hair through over-styling is removed.
It can also be simple to groom this hairstyle. Therefore it saves students time.” In schools, where we’re taught correct Christian values, ironically is the same place where being judgmental is inevitable. Just because you have longer hair than the prescribed doesn’t make him any less of a person; one can also search cool and presentable by sporting a hair without resorting to the “white sidewall” cut. Take as an example the hairstyle of a local celebrity, Robe Domingo. He managed to graduate with flying colors at Atone de Manila University!
Excuse my ignorance; I can’t understand what is time-consuming with styling a male’s hairstyle when you’re able only to finger-combed a more petite hair? Isn’t styling ladies’ long shoulder-length hair more tedious than a male’s ear-line hairstyle? How come the policy only pertains to males then? Everyone wants to appear suitable Barber Shop Mission Valley. I certainly want to seem reasonable. But by sporting a barber’s cut, how do I? Other people aren’t more comfortable with it either. Also, there are different ways to discipline students other than the implementation of the haircut policy. Perhaps a straight stricter policy on cleanliness will be more accepted by everybody.
Additionally, either having the hair cut short or growing it long won’t influence a student’s learning in school. So, why do we need to abide by such a rule? It’s everybody’s right to select how they should look. Forcing a student to appear distinctive from how he wants to has a considerable influence on his confidence and self-esteem, affecting his performance in school. Not enough self-esteem could cause depression, and depression hinders performance. It is just a shallow reason showing unsatisfactory performance in school just because of the insufficient self-esteem due to barber’s cut.
Schools should probably change it to a policy that gives them freedom regarding hairstyles and mirrors the decency parameters. So long as the Barber Shop Mission Valley hair cut student looks decent and neat with his preferred hairstyle, it should be allowed.